Eur. J. Entomol. 104 (4): 731-736, 2007 | DOI: 10.14411/eje.2007.093

Microhabitat preferences of Maculinea teleius (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) in a mosaic landscape

Péter BATÁRY*, Noémi ÖRVÖSSY*, Ádám KŐRÖSI, Marianna Vályi NAGY, László PEREGOVITS
Hungarian Natural History Museum, Ludovika tér 2., H-1083 Budapest, Hungary; e-mail: batary@nhmus.hu

The Scarce Large Blue (Maculinea teleius) is an endangered butterfly throughout Europe due to its special life-cycle and habitat loss. Our aims were to describe the microhabitats available to this butterfly, to test what factors influence the presence and density of M. teleius adults and to investigate the relationship between host ant species and M. teleius. The vicinities of eight fens were sampled, where there are four types of microhabitats available for this butterfly: Narrowleaf Cattail (Typha angustifolia), Purple Loosestrife (Lythrum salicaria), Marsh Woundwort (Stachys palustris) and Purple Moorgrass (Molinia coerulea) dominated vegetation. In five transects (50 × 5 m) around each fen (running from the edge of the fen into the meadows) the number of imagos was counted twice a day during the flight period. Along the transects, the following parameters were measured or assessed: number of flowerheads of foodplant (Sanguisorba officinalis), microhabitat type, grazing intensity, soil humidity, vegetation height and host ant presence. The four microhabitat types differed significantly in soil humidity, vegetation height, foodplant density and distance from a fen. Generally the Typha microhabitat, situated closest to fens, had the highest soil humidity and vegetation height, followed by the Lythrum, Stachys and finally the Molinia microhabitat along a gradient decreasing soil humidity and vegetation height. The foodplant was most abundant in the Lythrum and Stachys microhabitats. Using linear mixed models and forward stepwise manual selection we found that microhabitat type was the most important factor determining the presence of M. teleius. The local grazing intensity had no direct effect but flowerheads of the foodplant had a positive effect on the abundance of butterflies. The number of butterflies was significantly higher in quadrats where the host ant (Myrmica scabrinodis) was present compared to those where they were absent. Our results suggest that grazing should be continued in order to maintain the current distribution of microhabitats and survival of the butterflies.

Keywords: Lycaenidae, Maculinea teleius, microhabitat, habitat use, foodplant, host ant, grazing, wet meadow

Received: August 12, 2007; Revised: June 20, 2007; Accepted: June 20, 2007; Published: October 15, 2007  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
BATÁRY, P., ÖRVÖSSY, N., KŐRÖSI, Á., NAGY, M.V., & PEREGOVITS, L. (2007). Microhabitat preferences of Maculinea teleius (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) in a mosaic landscape. EJE, 104(4), 731-736. doi: 10.14411/eje.2007.093
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. ANGYAN J., TARDY J. & VAJNANE-MADARASSY A. (eds) 2003: Essentials of Farming on Protected and Environmentally Sensitive Areas. MezEgazda, Budapest, 625 pp. [in Hungarian])
    2. ANTON C., MUSCHE M., HULA V. & SETTELE J. 2005: Which factors determine the population density of the predatory butterfly Maculinea nausithous? In Settele J., Kuehn E. & Thomas J.A. (eds): Species Ecology along a European Gradient: Maculinea Butterflies as a Model. Studies on the Ecology and Conservation of Butterflies in Europe. Vol. 2. Pensoft, Sofia, pp. 57-59
    3. BALINT Z. 1991: Conservation of Butterflies in Hungary. Oedippus. 3: 5-36
    4. BONELLI S., CROCETTA A., BARBERO F. & BALLETTO E. 2005: Oviposition behaviour in the myrmecophilous butterfly Maculinea alcon (Lepidoptera: Lycenidae). In Settele J., Kuehn E. & Thomas J.A. (eds): Species Ecology along a European Gradient: Maculinea Butterflies as a Model. Studies on the Ecology and Conservation of Butterflies in Europe. Vol. 2. Pensoft, Sofia, pp. 65-68
    5. ELLIS S. 2003: Habitat quality and management for the northern brown argus butterfly Aricia artaxerxes (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) in North East England. Biol. Conserv. 113: 285-294 Go to original source...
    6. FIGURNY E. & WOYCIECHOWSKI M. 1998: Flowerhead selection for oviposition by females of the sympatric butterfly species Maculinea teleius and M. nausithous (Lepidoptera: Lycenidae). Entomol. Gener. 23: 215-222 Go to original source...
    7. GLINKA U. & SETTELE J. 2005: The effect of ant communities and spatial pattern for Maculinea nausithous. In Settele J., Kuehn E. & Thomas J.A. (eds): Species Ecology along a European Gradient: Maculinea Butterflies as a Model. Studies on the Ecology and Conservation of Butterflies in Europe. Vol. 2. Pensoft, Sofia, p. 72
    8. GRIEBELER E.M. & SEITZ A. 2002: An individual based model for the conservation of the endangered Large Blue Butterfly, Maculinea arion (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae). Ecol. Model. 156: 43-60 Go to original source...
    9. JOHST K., DRECHSLER M., THOMAS J. & SETTELE J. 2006: Influencing of mowing on the persistence of two large blue butterfly species. J. Appl. Ecol. 43: 333-342 Go to original source...
    10. KERY M., MATTHIES D. & FISCHER M. 2001: The effect of plant population size on the interactions between the rare plant Gentiana cruciata and its specialized herbivore Maculinea rebeli. J. Ecol. 89: 418-427 Go to original source...
    11. KONVICKA M., HULA V. & FRIC Z. 2003: Habitat of prehibernating larvae of the endangered butterfly Euphydryas aurinia (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae): What can be learned from vegetation composition and architecture? Eur. J. Entomol. 100: 313-322 Go to original source...
    12. KUHN E., FELDMANN R., THOMAS J. & SETTELE J. 2005: Ecology and Conservation of Butterflies in Europe. Studies on the Ecology and Conservation of Butterflies in Europe. Vol. 1. Pensoft, Sofia, 128 pp
    13. LORITZ H. & SETTELE J. 2005: Effects of human land-use on availability and quality of habitats of the Dusky Large Blue butterfly. In Settele J., Kuehn E. & Thomas J.A. (eds): Species Ecology along a European Gradient: Maculinea Butterflies as a Model. Studies on the Ecology and Conservation of Butterflies in Europe. Vol. 2. Pensoft, Sofia, pp. 225-227
    14. MAES D., VANREUSEL W., TALLOEN W. & VAN DYCK H. 2004: Functional conservation units for the endangered Alcon Blue butterfly Maculinea alcon in Belgium (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae). Biol. Conserv. 120: 229-241 Go to original source...
    15. MUSCHE M., ANTON C., WORGAN A. & SETTELE J. 2005: Do ant cues influence the oviposition preference in the myrmecophilous Maculinea nausithous? In Settele J., Kuehn E. & Thomas J.A. (eds): Species Ecology along a European Gradient: Maculinea Butterflies as a Model. Studies on the Ecology and Conservation of Butterflies in Europe. Vol. 2. Pensoft, Sofia, pp. 80-81
    16. NOWICKI P., PcPKOWSKA A., KUDLEK J., SKORKA P., WITEK M. & WOYCIECHOWSKI M. 2005a: Landscape scale research in butterfly population ecology - Maculinea case study. In Settele J., Kuehn E. & Thomas J.A. (eds): Species Ecology along a European Gradient: Maculinea Butterflies as a Model. Studies on the Ecology and Conservation of Butterflies in Europe. Vol. 2. Pensoft, Sofia, pp. 140-143
    17. NOWICKI P., WITEK M., SKORKA P., SETTELE J. & WOYCIECHOWSKI M. 2005b: Population ecology of the endangered butterflies Maculinea teleius and M. nausithous and the implications for conservation. Popul. Ecol. 47: 193-202 Go to original source...
    18. NEW T.R., PYLE R.M., THOMAS J.A., THOMAS C.D. & HAMMOND P.C. 1995: Butterfly conservation management. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 40: 57-38 Go to original source...
    19. PRONDVAI E., KASSAI F., CSOSZ S., ARNYAS E., BERECZKI J., TOTH A., VARGA Z., PEREGOVITS L. & KIS J. 2005: Oviposition in Maculinea alcon butterflies. In Settele J., Kuehn E. & Thomas J.A. (eds): Species Ecology along a European Gradient: Maculinea Butterflies as a Model. Studies on the Ecology and Conservation of Butterflies in Europe. Vol. 2. Pensoft, Sofia, pp. 82-83
    20. R DEVELOPMENT CORE TEAM 2004: R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna; URL: http://www.R-project.org
    21. RAVENSCROFT N.O.M. 1994: The ecology of chequered skipper butterfly Carterocephalus palaemon in Scotland. I. Microhabitat. J. Appl. Ecol. 31: 613-622 Go to original source...
    22. SETTELE J., KUHN E. & THOMAS J.A. 2005: Species Ecology along a European Gradient: Maculinea Butterflies as a Model. Studies on the Ecology and Conservation of Butterflies in Europe. Vol. 2. Pensoft, Sofia, 289 pp
    23. TARTALLY A. & CSOSZ S. 2004: Data on the ant hosts of the Maculinea butterflies (Lepidoptera: Lycenidae) of Hungary. Termved. KGzl. 11: 309-317 [in Hungarian, English abstract]
    24. THOMAS J.A. 1984: The behaviour and habitat requirement of Maculinea nausithous (the Dusky Large Blue Butterfly) and M. teleius (the Scarce Large Blue) in France Biol. Conserv. 28: 325-347 Go to original source...
    25. THOMAS J.A. 1990: Rare species conservation: case studies of European butterflies. In Spellerberg I.F., Goldsmith F.B. & Morris M.G. (eds): The Scientific Management of Temperate Communities for Conservation. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, pp. 149-197
    26. THOMAS J.A. 1994: The ecology and conservation of Maculinea arion and other European species of large blue. In Pullin A. (ed.): Ecology and Conservation of Butterflies. Chapman & Hall, London, pp. 180-196 Go to original source...
    27. THOMAS J.A. & ELMES G.W. 2001: Food-plant niche selection rather than the presence of ant nests explains oviposition patterns in the myrmecophilous butterfly genus Maculinea. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. (B) 268: 471-477 Go to original source...
    28. THOMAS J.A., ELMES G.W., WARDLAW J.C. & WOYCIECHOWSKI M. 1989: Host specificity among Maculinea butterflies in Myrmica ant nests. Oecologia 79: 452-457 Go to original source...
    29. THOMAS J.A., CLARKE R.T., ELMES G.W. & HOCHBERG M.E. 1998: Population dynamics in the genus Maculinea (Lepidoptera: Lycenidae). In Dempster J.P. & McLean I.F.G. (eds): Insect Populations. Chapman & Hall, London, pp. 261-290. Go to original source...
    30. VAN DYCK H., OOSTERMEIER J.G.B., TALLOEN W., FEENSTRA V., VAN DER HIDDE A. & WYNHOFF I. 2000: Does the presence of ant nests matter for oviposition to a specialized myrmecophilous Maculinea butterfly? Proc. R. Soc. Lond. (B) 267: 861-866 Go to original source...
    31. VAN SWAAY C.A.M. & WARREN M.S. 1999: Red Data Book of European Butterflies (Rhopalocera). Nature and Environment Series No. 99. Council of Europe, Strasbourg, 260 pp
    32. VAN SWAAY C.A.M. & WARREN M.S. 2003: Prime Butterfly Areas in Europe: Priority Sites for Conservation. National Reference Centre for Agriculture, Nature and Fisheries, Ministry of Agriculture, Nature Management and Fisheries, Wageningen,The Netherlands
    33. WALLISDEVRIES M.F. 2004: A quantitative conservation approach for the endangered butterfly Maculinea alcon. Conserv. Biol. 18: 489-499 Go to original source...
    34. WITEK M., SLIWINSKA E.B., SKORKA P., NOWICKI P., SETTELE J. & WOYCIECHOWSKI M. 2006: Polymorphic growth in larvae of Maculinea butterflies, as an example of biennialism in myrmecophilous insects. Oecologia 148: 729-733 Go to original source...
    35. ZIMMERMANN K., FRIC Z., FILIPOVA L. & KONVICKA M. 2005: Adult demography, dispersal and behaviour of Brenthis ino (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae): how to be a successful wetland butterfly. Eur. J. Entomol. 102: 699-706 Go to original source...

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content