Eur. J. Entomol. 102 (3): 495-501, 2005 | DOI: 10.14411/eje.2005.071

Ant-aphid interactions in multispecies ant communities: Some ecological and ethological aspects

Tatiana A. NOVGORODOVA
Institute of Animal Systematics and Ecology, Siber. Br., Russian Academy of Sciences, Frunze str., 11, 630091 Novosibirsk, Russi a;

Investigations of the interactions between aphids and ants in multispecies ant communities and an experimental investigation of some ethological aspects of ant-aphid interactions were carried out in mixed forests at Novosibirsk Academic Centre, from 1998-2002. The eight species of ants investigated were characterized by different levels of territorial organization and interaction with aphids, which were associated with different degrees of specialization of the worker ants. The most myrmecophilous species of aphids (24 out of 33 species identified) were associated with the red wood ants. By placing Coccinella septempunctata Linnaeus (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) in aphid colonies it was shown that only ants with large protected territories attacked the adults and larvae of the predator. Other species of ants either protected aphids only from adult ladybirds or did not guard them at all. Moreover, only individuals of Formica s. str., which has specialized workers, did not switch to collecting protein food. However, aphids make up a considerable part of the prey of ants, in which non-myrmecophilous aphids predominate (about 60-100% of the aphid prey). Moreover, ants only killed unattended or damaged myrmecophilous aphids. Formica s. str., which has the highest level of social and territorial organization, provides aphids with the most services and is the dominant species forming symbiotic relationships with aphids in the communities studied.

Keywords: Ants-aphids interaction, Formicinae, Myrmicinae, Coccinella septempunctata, multispecies communities, symbiosis, aphid diversity, behaviour, trophobionts, foragers

Received: September 30, 2004; Revised: February 24, 2005; Accepted: February 24, 2005; Published: August 15, 2005  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
NOVGORODOVA, T.A. (2005). Ant-aphid interactions in multispecies ant communities: Some ecological and ethological aspects. EJE, 102(3), 495-501. doi: 10.14411/eje.2005.071
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. ADDICOTT J.F. 1978: Competition for mutualists: aphids and ants. Can. J. Zool. 56: 2093-2096. Go to original source...
    2. ANDERSON C. & MCSHEA D.W. 2001: Intermediary-level parts in insect societies: adaptive structures that ants build away from the nest. Ins. Soc. 48: 291-301 Go to original source...
    3. BHATKAR A.P. 1983: Interspecific trophallaxis in ants, its ecological and evolutionary significance. In Jaisson P. (ed.): Social Insects in the Tropics 2. Universite Paris-Nord, Paris, pp. 105-123
    4. BRADLEY G.A. & HINKS J.D. 1968: Ants, aphids and jack pine in Manitoba. Can. Entomol. 100: 40-50 Go to original source...
    5. BRISTOW C.M. 1984: Differential benefits from ant attendance to two species of Homoptera on New York ironweed. J. Anim. Ecol. 53: 715-726 Go to original source...
    6. BURNS D.P. 1973: The foraging and tending behavior of Dolichoderus taschenbergi (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). Can. Entomol. 105: 97-104 Go to original source...
    7. CHERIX D. 1987: Relation between diet and polyethism in Formica colonies. Behav. Soc. Insects (Basel) 54: 93-115
    8. CUSHMAN J.H. & ADDICOTT J.F. 1991: Conditional interactions in ant-plant-herbivore mutualisms. In Huxley C.R. & Culter D.F. (eds): Ant-Plant Interactions. Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 92-115 Go to original source...
    9. DLUSSKIY G.M. 1967: Ants of Genus Formica. Nauka, Moscow, 236 pp. (in Russian)
    10. DMITRIENKO V.K. & PETRENKO E.S. 1976: Ants of taiga biocenosis of Siberia. Nauka, Novosibirsk, 220 pp. (in Russian)
    11. DOBRZANSKA J. 1966: The control of the territory by Lasius fuliginosus Latr. Acta Biol. Exp. (Warsaw) 26(2): 193-213
    12. FISCHER M.K., VOLKL W., SCHOPF R. & HOFFMANN K.H. 2002: Age-specific patterns in honeydew production and honeydew composition in the aphid Metopeurum fuscoviride: implications for ant-attendance. Ins. Physiol. 48: 319-326 Go to original source...
    13. HOLLDOBLER B. & WILSON E.O. 1990: The Ants. Springer, Berlin, 732 pp Go to original source...
    14. MORDVILKO A.K. 1901: Biology and morphology of aphids. Proc. Russ. Entomol. Soc. 33: 418-475 (in Russian)
    15. MORDVILKO A.K. 1936: Ants and aphids. Priroda 4: 44-55 (in Russian)
    16. NIXON G.E.J. 1951: The Association of Ants with Aphids and Coccids. Commonwealth Institute of Entomology. London, pp. 1-36
    17. NOVGORODOVA T.A. 2002: The Ethological Aspects of Ant-Aphid Interaction. PhD thesis. Novosibirsk, 23 pp. (in Russian)
    18. NOVGORODOVA T.A. 2004: The symbiotic relationships between ants and aphids. J. Gen. Biol. 65(2): 152-165 (in Russian, English abstr.)
    19. NOVGORODOVA T.A. & REZNIKOVA ZH.I. 1996: Ecological aspects of interaction between ants and aphids in the forest park zone of the Novosibirsk Scientific Center. Siber. J. Ecol. (3-4): 239-245
    20. OFFENBERG J. 2001: Balancing between mutualism and exploitation: the symbiotic interaction between Lasius ants and aphids. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 49: 304-310 Go to original source...
    21. REZNIKOVA ZH.I. & NOVGORODOVA T.A. 1998a: The importance of individual and social experience for interaction between ants and symbiotic aphids. Dokl. Biol. Sci. 359: 173-175
    22. REZNIKOVA ZH.I. & NOVGORODOVA T.A. 1998b: Division of labour and exchange of information within ant settlements. Usp. Sovrem. Biol. 118: 345-357 (in Russian, English abstr.)
    23. SAKATA H. 1994: How an ant decides to prey or to attend aphids. Rev. Popul. Ecol. 36(1): 45-51 Go to original source...
    24. SKINNER G.J. 1980: The feeding habits of the wood-ants Formica rufa in a limestone woodland in Northwest England. J. Anim. Ecol. 49: 381-394 Go to original source...
    25. SKINNER G.J. & WHITTAKER J.B. 1981: An experimental investigation of interrelationships between the wood ant (Formica rufa) and some tree-canopy herbivores. J. Anim. Ecol. 50: 313-326 Go to original source...
    26. SLOGGETT J.J., WOOD R.A. & MAJERUS M.E.N. 1998: Adaptations of Coccinella magnifica Redtenbacher, a myrmecophilous coccinellid, to aggression by wood ants (Formica rufa group). I. Adult behavioral adaptation, its ecological context and evolution. J. Ins. Behav. 11: 889-904 Go to original source...
    27. STADLER B. & DIXON A.F.G. 1999: Ant attendance in aphids: why different degrees of myrmecophily? Ecol. Entomol. 24: 363-369 Go to original source...
    28. STADLER B., KINDLMANN P., SMILAUER P. & FIEDLER K. 2003: A comparative analysis of morphological and ecological characters of European aphids and lycaenids in relation to ant attendance. Oecologia 135: 422-430 Go to original source...
    29. SUDD J.H. 1987: Ant aphid mutualism. In Minks A.K. & Harrewijn P. (eds): Aphids. Their Biology, Natural Enemies and Control. (A). Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 355-365
    30. VEPSALAINEN K. & SAVOLAINEN R. 1994: Ant-aphid interaction and territorial dynamics of wood ants. Memor. Zool. 48: 251-259
    31. WAY M.J. 1963: Mutualism between ants and honeydew producing Homoptera. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 8: 307-344 Go to original source...
    32. WELLENSTEIN G. 1952: Zur Ernaehrungsbiologie der roten Waldameise (F. rufa L.) Z. Pflanzenkr. 59: 430-451

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content