Eur. J. Entomol. 111 (3): 349-355, 2014 | DOI: 10.14411/eje.2014.050

Differences between beetle communities colonizing cattle and horse dung

Radosław MROCZYŃSKI1, Karol KOMOSIŃSKI2
1 Department of Ecology and Environmental Protection, Faculty of Biology and Biotechnology, University of Warmia and Mazury, Pl. Łódzki 3, 10-727 Olsztyn, Poland; e-mail: radzio.fm@gmail.com
2 Departament of Zoology, Faculty of Biology and Biotechnology, University of Warmia and Mazury, Oczapowskiego 5, 10-718 Olsztyn, Poland; e-mail: kurcik@gmail.com

Piles of fresh cow and horse dung were placed in a pasture in Dziarny in north-east Poland. The differences between the beetle communities colonizing both types of dung at various stages of succession were analyzed. Beetles were sampled 2, 5, 10, 15, 20 and 25 days after placing the piles of dung in the pasture. A total of 5 343 individuals belonging to 125 species and 10 families were collected in 24 samples. None of the species of beetles collected colonized exclusively one type of dung. Several taxa showed a clear preference for cow or horse dung. Beetle succession proceeded faster in horse dung and there were significant differences in the dominant species recorded in the two types of dung. The reasons for the reported patterns are discussed.

Keywords: Coleoptera, Aphodiidae, Hydrophilidae, Ptiliidae, Staphylinidae, cow dung, horse dung

Received: December 19, 2013; Accepted: April 11, 2014; Revised: April 11, 2014; Prepublished online: May 27, 2014; Published: July 14, 2014Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
MROCZYŃSKI, R., & KOMOSIŃSKI, K. (2014). Differences between beetle communities colonizing cattle and horse dung. Eur. J. Entomol., 111(3), 349-355. doi: 10.14411/eje.2014.050.
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)

    • Open full article

    References

    1. Boukal D.S., Boukal M., Fikacek M., Hajek J., Klecka J., Skalisk S., Stasny J. & Trunek D. 2007: Catalogue of water beetles of the Czech Republic. - Klapalekiana (Suppl.) 43, 289 pp
    2. Breymeyer A. 1974: Analysis of a sheep pasture ecosystem in the Pieniny mountains (the Carpathians). XI. The role of coprophagous beetles (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae) in the utilization of sheep dung. - Ekol. Polska 22: 617-634
    3. Breymeyer A. & Zachaireva-Stoilova B. 1975: Scarabaeidae in two mountain pastures in Poland and Bulgaria. - Bull. Acad. Pol. Sci. (Sci. Biol. II) 33: 173-180
    4. Bunalski M. 2006: Zuki (Coleoptera: Scarabaeoidea) wschodnich rubiezy Polski. Studium faunistyczno-ekologiczne czesci polnocnej i srodkowej. [Lamellicorn Beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeoidea) of Eastern Border of Poland. A Faunistic and Ecological Study of the Northern and Central Parts.] Rozprawy naukowe 376, Akademia Rolnicza im. Augusta Cieszkowskiego, Poznan, 133 pp. [in Polish, English abstr.]
    5. Burakowski B., Mroczkowski M. & Stefanska J. 1973-2000: Katalog Fauny Polski. Catalogus Faunae Poloniae. Vol. XXIII, Tom 2-22. Chrzaszcze - Coleoptera. PWN, Warszawa
    6. Desiere M. 1973: Ecologie des Coleopteres coprophages. - Annls Soc. R. Zool. Belg. 103: 135-145
    7. Dickinson C.H. & Craig G. 1990: Effects of water on the composition and release of nutrients from cow pats. - New Phytologist 115: 139-147 Go to original source...
    8. Dormont L., Epinat G. & Lumaret J.-P. 2004: Trophic preferences mediated by olfactory cues in dung beetles collonizing cattle and horse dung. - Environ. Entomol. 33: 370-377 Go to original source...
    9. Dormont L., Rapior S., McKey D.B. & Lumaret J.-P. 2007: Influence of dung volatiles on the process of resource selection by coprophagous beetles. - Chemoecology 17: 23-30 Go to original source...
    10. Dormont L., Jay-Robert P., Bessiere J.-M., Rapior S. & Lumaret J.-P. 2010: Innate olfactory preferences in dung beetles. - J. Exp. Biol. 213: 3177-3186 Go to original source...
    11. Frank F. & Shutt M.A. 1898: Barn-Yard Manure its Nature, Functions, Composition, Fermentation, Preservation and Application. Direction of the Hon. Sydney A. Fisher Minister of Agriculture, Ottawa, 29 pp
    12. Hammer O. 1941: Biological and ecological investigations on flies associated with pasturing cattle and their excrement. - Vidensk. Meddel. Dansk Naturhist. Foren. 105: 143-393
    13. Hanski I. & Koskela H. 1979: Resource partitioning in six guilds of dung-inhabiting beetles (Coleoptera). - Ann. Entomol. Fenn. 45: 1-12
    14. Hinton H.E. 1944: Some general remarks on sub-social beetles, with notes on the biology of the staphylinid, Platystethus arenarius (Fourcroy). - Proc. R. Entomol. Soc. Lond. (A) 19: 115-128
    15. Holter P. 2004: Dung feeding in hydrophilid, geotrupid and scarabaeid beetles: Examples of parallel evolution. - Eur. J. Entomol. 101: 365-372 Go to original source...
    16. Holter P. & Scholtz C. H. 2007: What do dung beetles eat? - Ecol. Entomol. 32: 690-697 Go to original source...
    17. Hughes R.D., Ferrar P., Macqueen A., Durie P., McKinney G.T. & Morley F.H.W. 1975: Introduced dung beetles and Australian pasture ecosystems. - J. Appl. Ecol. 12: 819-837 Go to original source...
    18. Kasprzak K. & Niedbala W. 1981: Wskazniki biocenotyczne stosowane przy porzadkowaniu i analizie danych w badaniach ilosciowych. [Biocenotic indicators applied for data organising and analysis in quantitative studys.] In Gorny M. & Grum L. (eds): Metody Stosowane w Zoologii Gleby. [Methods Applied for Soil Zoology.] PWN, Warszawa, pp. 397-416 [in Polish]
    19. Koskela H. 1972: Habitat selection of dung-inhabiting Staphylinids (Coleoptera) in relation to age of the dung. - Ann. Zool. Fenn. 9: 156-171
    20. Koskela H. & Hanski I. 1977: Structure and succession in a beetle community inhabiting cow dung. - Ann. Zool. Fenn. 14: 204-223
    21. Landin B.-O. 1961: Ecological studies on dung-beetles (Col. Scarabaeidae). - Opuscula Entomol. (Suppl.) 19, 227 pp
    22. Martinez M. & Suarez M.T. 2006: Phenology, trophic preferences, and reproductive activity in some dung-inhabiting beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeoidea) in Ell llano de Las Flores, Oaxaca, Mexico. - Proc. Entomol. Soc. Wash. 108: 774-784
    23. Merritt R.W. & Anderson J.R. 1977: The effects of different pasture and rangeland ecosystems on the annual dynamics in cattle droppings. - Hilgardia 45: 31-71 Go to original source...
    24. Miller A. 1961: The mouth parts and digestive tract of adult dung beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae), with reference to the ingestion of helminth eggs. - J. Parasitol. 47: 735-744 Go to original source...
    25. Olechowicz E. 1974: Analysis of a sheep pasture ecosystem in the Pienieny mountains (the Carpathians). X. - Ekol. Polska 22: 589-616
    26. Olechowicz E. 1976: The role of coprophagous dipterans in a mountain pasture ecosystem. - Ekol. Polska 24: 125-165
    27. Psarev A.M. 2001: Rhythms of diel activity of coprophilous beetles of mountain pastures. - Russ. Entomol. J. 10: 405-409
    28. Psarev A.M. 2002: Succession in an insect community inhabiting horse dung. - Russ. Entomol. J. 11: 287-290
    29. Slachta M., Frelich J. & Svoboda L. 2008: Seasonal biomass distribution of dung beetles (Scarabaeidae, Geotrupidae, Hydrophilidae) in mountain pastures of South-West Bohemia. - J. Agrobiol. 25: 163-176
    30. Sowig P. & Wassmer T. 1994: Resource partitioning in coprophagous beetles from sheep dung: Phenology and microhabitat preferences. - Zool. Jb. Syst. 121: 171-192
    31. Szujecki A. 2008: Klucze do oznaczania owadow Polski, 24a. Chrzaszcze - Coleoptera. Kusakowate - Staphylinidae. - Polskie Towarzystwo Entomologiczne, Torun, 229 pp
    32. Wassmer T. 1994: Seasonality of coprophagous beetles in the Kaiserstuhl area near Freiburg (SW-Germany) including the winter months. - Acta Ecol. 15: 607-631

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content