Eur. J. Entomol. 107 (1): 133-135, 2010 | DOI: 10.14411/eje.2010.018

Alteration of sex-related developmental modules: A case of "feminized" male wing morphology in Creobroter gemmatus (Mantodea: Hymenopodidae)

Olivier BÉTHOUX
Freiberg University of Mining and Technology, Institute of Geology, Department of Palaeontology, Bernhard-von-Cotta Str. 2,

A particular case of the alteration of the organization of a developmental module is presented, viz. mixed gynandromorphism in Creobroter gemmatus, in which a male exhibits the usual fore- and hind wing venation and shape of its sex, but patterns of coloration typical of females. Homologies between corresponding areas of the fore- and hind wings are suggested. "Feminization" is defined as the occurrence of traits typical of the female phenotype in a male, and is suggested as a plausible way in which insect wing morphology may be transformed.

Keywords: Homology, modular organization, mixed gynandromorphism, feminization, evolution, Hymenopodidae

Received: August 5, 2009; Accepted: October 6, 2009; Revised: October 6, 2009; Published: February 15, 2010Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
BÉTHOUX, O. (2010). Alteration of sex-related developmental modules: A case of "feminized" male wing morphology in Creobroter gemmatus (Mantodea: Hymenopodidae). Eur. J. Entomol.107(1), 133-135. doi: 10.14411/eje.2010.018.
Download citation

References

  1. BATEMAN R.M. & DIMICHELE W.A. 2002: Generating and filtering major phenotypic novelties: neoGoldschmidtian saltation revisited. In Cronk Q.C.B., Bateman R.M. & Hawkins J.A. (eds): Developmental Genetics and Plant Evolution. Taylor & Francis, London, pp. 109-159
  2. BETHOUX O. & WIELAND F. 2009: Evidence for Carboniferous origin of the order Mantodea (Insecta: Dictyoptera) gained from forewing morphology. Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 156: 79-113 Go to original source...
  3. BROCK P.D. 2001: Studies on the Australasian stick-insect genus Extatosoma Gray (Phasmida: Phasmatidae: Tropoderinae: Extatosomatini). J. Orthopt. Res. 10: 303-313 Go to original source...
  4. LOVE A.C. & RAFF R.A. 2006: Larval ectoderm, organizational homology, and the origins of evolutionary novelties. J. Exp. Zool. (B) 306: 18-34 Go to original source...
  5. PATTHY L. 2003: Modular assembly of genes and the evolution of new functions. Genetica 118: 217-231 Go to original source...
  6. ROSIN F.M. & KRAMER E.M. 2009: Old dogs, new tricks: regulatory evolution in conserved genetic modules leads to novel morphologies in plants. Dev. Biol. 332: 25-35 Go to original source...
  7. SCHLOSSER G. 2004: The role of modules in development and evolution. In Schlosser G. & Wagner G.P. (eds): Modularity in Development and Evolution. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 519-582
  8. SCHLOSSER G. & WAGNER G.P. (eds) 2004a: Modularity in Development and Evolution. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 600 pp
  9. SCHLOSSER G. & WAGNER G.P. 2004b: Introduction: the modularity concept in developmental and evolutionary biology. In Schlosser G. & Wagner G.P. (eds): Modularity in Development and Evolution. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 1-11
  10. SHAROV A.G. 1968: Filogeniya orthopteroidnykh nasekomykh. Trudy Paleontol. Inst. Akad. Nauk SSSR 118: 1-216
  11. TINGHITELLA R.M. 2008: Rapid evolutionary change in a sexual signal: genetic control of the mutation "flatwing" that renders male field crickets (Teleogryllus oceanicus) mute. Heredity 100: 261-267 Go to original source...
  12. ZUK M., ROTENBERRY J.T. & TINGHITELLA R.M. 2006: Silent night: adaptative disapperance of a sexual signal in a paratized population of field crickets. Biol. Lett. 2006: 521-524 Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.