Eur. J. Entomol. 106 (2): 303-313, 2009 | DOI: 10.14411/eje.2009.036

Sexual dimorphism and geographical male polymorphism in the ghost moth Hepialus humuli (Lepidoptera: Hepialidae): Scale ultrastructure and evolutionary aspects

Svend KAABER1, Niels P. KRISTENSEN*,2, Thomas J. SIMONSEN**,***,2
1 Natural History Museum Aarhus, Universitetsparken, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark; e-mail: svend@kaaber.net
2 Natural History Museum of Denmark (Zoological Museum), University of Copenhagen, Universitetsparken 15, DK-2100 Copenhagen Ø, Denmark; e-mail: npkristensen@snm.ku.dk

Throughout most of its range the Palaearctic moth Hepialus humuli shows a striking sexual dimorphism correlated with a dimorphism in wing scale ultrastructure. Male uppersides are uniformly silvery white, due to light reflection from unpigmented scales with an elaborate internal cuticular meshwork; the conspicuous wings are visual cues for females when lekking males swarm at dusk. Female uppersides have a yellow-and-orange pigment pattern, and commonplace scale morphology. Male specimens from the Shetland and Faroe Islands populations are polymorphic, with wing uppersides ranging from the typical uniform white to being patterned much as in females, or even more melanic; forewing length is slightly greater in the darker and patterned male morphs. Male wing-scale polymorphism is only modest: even the superficially most female-like specimens are overall similar to typical males with respect to important details of scale structure. The polymorphic N. Atlantic forms are likely derived from dimorphic ancestors of the continental type. The principal selective force favouring male darkening in these insular populations is most probably a locally strong predation by visual hunters (primarily gulls and terns) on the lekking moths, combined with a lessened importance of the colour-related conspicuousness of males for female mate-searching at the high ambient light level at the swarming time at these high latitudes. This assumption is supported by the finding of a higher abundance of cryptic males (and perhaps by the smaller average size of the non-cryptic male morphs) in sites with intense bird predation.

Keywords: Hepialidae, Hepialus humuli, wing length, wing-scale structure, bird and bat predation, predatory selection, prey visibility, polymorphism, sexual dimorphism, Faroe Isles, Shetland Isles

Received: December 18, 2008; Accepted: February 24, 2009; Published: May 20, 2009

Download citation

References

  1. ANDERSSON S., RYDELL J. & SVENSSON M.G.E. 1998: Light, predation and the lekking behaviour of the ghost swift Hepialus humuli (L.) (Lepidoptera: Hepialidae). Proc. R. Soc. Lond. (B) 264: 1345-1351 Go to original source...
  2. BAAGOE H. & BLOCH D. 1994: Bats (Chiroptera) in the Faroe Islands. Frodskaparrit 41: 83-88
  3. BROCHMANN C., GABRIELSEN T.M., NORDAL I., LANDVIK J.Y. & ELVEN R. 2003: Glacial survival or tabula rasa? The history of North Atlantic biota revisited. Taxon 52: 417-450 Go to original source...
  4. CAROLSFELD-KRAUSE A.G. 1959: The mating of Hepialidae (Lep.). Entomol. Rec. J. Var. 71: 33-34
  5. DAHL L. 1954: Firvaldur i FIroyum [Lepidoptera of the Faroes]. Frodskaparrit 3: 128-154
  6. DE FREINA J.J. & WITT T.J. 1990: Die Bombyces und Sphinges der Westpalaearktis 2. Forschung und Wissenschaft, Munich, 143 pp
  7. DOWNEY J.C. & ALLYN A.C. 1975: Wingscale morphology and nomenclature. Bull. Allyn Mus. 31: 1-32
  8. FORD E.B. 1955: Moths. Collins, London, 266 pp
  9. HANSEN J. & JENSEN J.-K. 2005: Colour morphs of the ghost moth Hepialus humuli L. (Lepidoptera, Hepialidae) in the Faroe Islands. Entomol. Medd. 73: 123-130
  10. HEATH J. 1976: Hepialidae. In Heath J. (ed.): The Moths and Butterflies of Great Britain and Ireland 1. Blackwell Scientific Publications/Curwen Press, London and Oxford, pp. 166-170
  11. HOFFMEYER S. 1948/ 1960: De Danske Spindere. 2nd ed. Universitetsforlaget, Arhus, 194 pp
  12. JENSEN M.J., MILLER L.A. & RYDELL J. 2001: Detection of prey in a cluttered environment by the northern bat Eptesicus nilssonii. J. Exp. Biol. 204: 199-208
  13. KETTLEWELL B. 1973: The Evolution of Melanism. The Study of a Recurring Necessity. With Special Reference to Industrial Melanism in the Lepidoptera. Clarendon Press, Oxford, 423 pp
  14. KORYSZKA J. 1989: An observation on the dawn flight of the ghost moth. Bull. Amat. Entomol. Soc. 48: 114
  15. KRISTENSEN N.P. & SIMONSEN T.J. 2003: 'Hairs' and scales. In Kristensen N.P. (ed.): Lepidoptera: Moths and Butterflies 2. Handbuch der Zoologie/Handbook of Zoology IV/36. Walter de Gruyter, Berlin and New York, pp. 9-22
  16. LORIMER R.L. 1983: The Lepidoptera of the Orkney Islands. Classey, Faringdon, 103 pp
  17. MAJERUS M.E.N. 1998: Melanism. Evolution in Action. Oxford University Press, Oxford, New York, Tokyo, 370 pp
  18. MALLET J. 1984: Sex roles in the ghost moth, Hepialus humuli (L.) and a review of mating in the Hepialidae. Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 80: 67-82 Go to original source...
  19. MIKKOLA K. 1974: Timing of swarming in Hepiolus humuli L. (Lep., Hepialidae): a summary. Entomol. Medd. 42: 76-77
  20. MITCHELL-JONES A.J., AMORI G., BOGDANOWICZ W., KRYSTUFEK B., REIJNDERS P.J.H., SPITZENBERGER F., STUBBE M., THISSEN J. B.M., VOHRALIK V. & ZIMA J. (eds) 1999: The Atlas of European Mammals. Poyser (for the Societas Europaea Mammalogica), London, 484 pp
  21. NIELSEN E.S., ROBINSON G.S. & WAGNER D.L. 2000: Ghostmoths of the world: a global inventory and bibliography of the Exoporia (Mnesarchaeoidea and Hepialoidea) (Lepidoptera). J. Nat. Hist. 34: 823-878 Go to original source...
  22. RYDELL J. 1998: Bat defence in lekking ghost swifts (Hepialus humuli), a moth without ultrasonic hearing. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. (B) 265: 1373-1376 Go to original source...
  23. RYDELL J. & EKLOF J. 2003: Vision complements echolocation in an aerial-hawking bat. Naturwissenschaften 90: 481-483 Go to original source...
  24. SIMONSEN T.J. 2001: Wing vestiture in non-ditrysian Lepidoptera (Insecta). Comparative morphology and phylogenetic implications. Acta Zool. 82: 275-298 Go to original source...
  25. SKINNER B. 1984: Colour Identification Guide to Moths of the British Isles. Penguin, Harmondsworth, 267 pp
  26. SOUTH R. 1961: The Moths of the British Isles. 4th ed. Frederick Warne, London and New York, x + 595 pp