Eur. J. Entomol. 105 (2): 361-362, 2008 | DOI: 10.14411/eje.2008.043

Polymorphic microsatellite loci in the endangered butterfly Lycaena helle (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae)

Jan Christian HABEL1, Aline FINGER2, Marc MEYER1, Thomas SCHMITT2, Thorsten ASSMANN3
1 Musée National d'Histoire Naturelle, Section Zoologie des Invertébrés, 25, rue Münster, L-2160 Luxembourg; e-mail:
2 Biogeographie, Universität Trier, D-54296 Trier, Germany
3 Leuphana Universität Lüneburg, Institut für Ökologie und Umweltchemie, D-21335 Lüneburg, Germany

Six polymorphic microsatellite loci were isolated in the endangered butterfly Lycaena helle. Five of them provided interpretable results. We detected four to 34 alleles per locus in a total of 235 samples (males and females) collected from meadows in the Ardennes-Eifel (Germany, Luxemburg and Belgium) and the Westerwald (Germany). We collected one leg for DNA-extraction as a non-lethal method. The expected heterozygosities ranged from 48.6% to 83.1%, depending on the locus analysed. These markers are currently being used in our studies of the species´ phylogeography over its western Palearctic distribution area and for the analysis of the conservation status of the fragmented populations in Central Europe.

Keywords: Lepidoptera, Lycaenidae, Lycaena helle, microsatellite marker

Received: June 15, 2007; Accepted: January 21, 2008; Revised: January 21, 2008; Published: May 15, 2008Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
HABEL, J.C., FINGER, A., MEYER, M., SCHMITT, T., & ASSMANN, T. (2008). Polymorphic microsatellite loci in the endangered butterfly Lycaena helle (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae). Eur. J. Entomol.105(2), 361-362. doi: 10.14411/eje.2008.043.
Download citation


  1. EBERT G. & RENNWALD E. (ed.) 1991: Die Schmetterlinge Baden-Wuerttembergs. Vol. 1. Eugen Ulmer, Stuttgart, 552 pp
  2. FISCHER K., BEINLICH B. & PLACHTER H. 1999: Population structure, mobility and habitat preferences of the violet copper Lycaena helle (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) in Western Germany: implications for conservation. J. Conserv. 3: 43-52 Go to original source...
  3. GRUENSTEIN M. & HOGNESS D.S. 1975: Colony hybridization. Method for the isolation of cloned DNA's that contain a specific gene. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 72: 3961-3965 Go to original source...
  4. HAMILTON M.B., PINCUS E.L., DI FIORE A. & FLEISCHER R.C. 1999: Universal linker and ligation procedures for construction of genomic DNA libraries enriched for microsatellites. Biotechniques. 27: 500-507
  5. IUCN 1996: The 1996 IUCN Red List of Threatened Animals. IUCN Publications Service Unit, Cambridge, 341 pp
  6. KUDRNA O. 2002: The distribution atlas of European butterflies. Oedippus 20: 1-342
  7. LUIKART G., SHERWIN W.B., STEELE B.M. & ALLENDORF F.W. 1998: Usefulness of molecular markers for detecting population bottlenecks via monitoring genetic change. Mol. Ecol. 7: 963-974 Go to original source...
  8. OOSTERHOUT C. VAN, HUTCHINSON W.F., WILLS D.P.M., SHIPLEY P. 2004: Micro-checker: Software for identifying and correcting genotyping errors in microsatellite data. Mol. Ecol. Not. 4: 535-538 Go to original source...
  9. PEAKALL R. & SMOUSE P.E. 2006: GENEALEX 6: Genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. Mol. Ecol. Notes 6: 288-295 Go to original source...
  10. VAN SWAAY C.A.M. & WARREN M. 1999: Red Data Book of European Butterflies (Rhopalocera). Nature and Environment 99, Council of Europe Publishing, Strasbourg, 264 pp
  11. TOLMAN T. & LEWINGTON R. 1997: Field Guide Butterflies of Britain and Europe. Harper Collins, London, 384 pp

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.